In
this analysis, it is important to determine the amount of change that
has occurred to the area affected by the E-waste over the past decades
as well as its surrounding areas. The specific study area of
Agbogbloshie, which lies at the emergence of two river flows, has had a
long history of E-waste dumping as well as pollution from the burning of
the waste as well as runoff into surrounding areas. The release of
these chemicals into the soil as well as water leads to a higher
reflectance rate that shows an increase in the temperature of the
surrounding area. Using images from the GLOVIS satellite, an analysis of
the thermal image (band 6) was possible. This made it possible to make a
comparison of more recent images of the site to older images taken to
determine the change in temperature as more E-waste and chemicals have
been added over the years.
The first analysis was made from the year
1991 to 2011, which showed an obvious increase in temperature of the
site itself as well as the surrounding areas. A change detection map was
applied to these two thermal images, which led to the expected results
of an increase in temperature of the site itself, as well as a large
area surrounding the site. In the following change detection maps, an increase in temperature is represented by the red.
A
second analysis was done to confirm these results by making the same
comparison but with the thermal images of March 1985 and February 2003. A
change detection map was made to show an increase in temperature
between this time frame as well. It shows the surrounding water
appearing warming than the previous decades. It appears that the water
adjacent to the dump site has had the largest temperature increase as a
result of the runoff directly into the river.
Although
the change detection map shows an increase in temperature, there are a
number of natural disturbances that can affect the accuracy or
dramatization of the actual warming that is occurring. One disturbance
that is plausible in this area is the difference in atmospheric
conditions of the different times that the images were taken. Although
both images were taken in the same month of the year in the first
analysis, factors such as water content in the atmosphere due to the
proximity of the site to the ocean may have an effect on the temperature
shown in the image. Another issue that can be applied to the second
analysis is the time of the year that each of these images was taken.
The first image from 1985 was taken in March and the second was taken in
February of 2003, which may affect the maps accuracy due to difference
in seasonality.This can ultimately lead to a flaw in the accuracy of the change detection, as well as few other less obvious disturbances.
No comments:
Post a Comment